~H}{RW~ MasterReaction
|
About Revealing BlocksWell I have seen some ppl that want to know the winners blocks by finishing them off.
For boosted 300 block duels that is fine. The loser usually finishes off the winner to see what block he has and to make sure he did not overbost.
Non boost dueling is a little different. I takes a fair bit of editing and planing to come up with a good Non Boost dueler so you dont have to let the loser finish you off if you don't want to. The best way to prevent this is to unbreak as soon as the duel is over.
If are a poor sport about losing that's too bad. Months ago I used to duel with FS guys a lot and never tried to find out their blocks. I just made a better dueler and planed a different strategey. Eventually you will overcome you opponent if you stick with it. Don't be a sore loser just become a beter editer.
Okya have fun all. The KRW rocks 
|
monkeyman370
|
thanks for finally stating that master that wil help alot 
|
~FCO~ Mr GigGles
|
ya cool i like it
|
{{KRW}} <><>_
|
yep good strategy is evrything u dont even need 2 have 39 blocks on if only your oppoent think you have...
be4 im staring a duel im trying to get as many informations about my opponet(how good editor he is) i can say there are 4 lvls of magic duel editing:
1. the opponent is using merciless ruthles and or stringent(the most comon block modiffiers)
2.this guy knows thet merciless ,ruthles,stringent ale not good breakers and he is using lover wariations like harsh(with this guy we start our duel from the lowest wariation breaker)
3.he knows is using mixed block wariations of all fixes so its much harder to win the duel so we need 2 start breaking from the lowest wariation breaker but we use half of the normal braking time on each one and if it wont break him by the 1 cycle just repeat it)
4. the last and the final dueler this duels are the harest he can use all variations in any combinatios so we dont have any sysatem to star our duel (ive got 1 but all players need 2 find their own)
this is based on all my magic dueling obserwations ...
|
|
|
